Employer · South Carolina

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS

Greenville, SC · ~41 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS: 2.5 TCR = 56% of industry BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS safety composite

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2023 to 5.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 56% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #35/72
  • PHOTO University of Minnes…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: University of Minnesota Health Clinics - EVS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS averages 2.5 TCR (56% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS falls in its industry

4,064 industry establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 72 industry employers in South Carolina.

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS
Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Bon Secours St Francis Health System Eastside - EVS has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · SC · Greenville

4,064 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR University of Minnesota Health Clinics - EVS 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA Childrens and Womens Hospital - EVS 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Services and Supplies, Inc. d/b/a Associated Services Cleaning and Restoration 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Sumter State College-Cust 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bad Creek Hydro 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCMEEKIN STEAM PLANT 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edgefield County Water and Sewer Authority 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unitherm Columbia 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR League City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mapei West Chicago 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McLarney Construction, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Greene Welding Hardware 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Farmington Hills 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron City Express 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nebraska 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gartner Coatings Inc. 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.