Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · North Carolina

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center

Charlotte, NC · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center: 4.8 TCR = 83% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center safety composite

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center: 2.8 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2020

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center's TCR rose 5.5 from 2.8 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #241/330
  • PHOTO Book Fairs - Chicago
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Book Fairs - Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center averages 4.8 TCR (83% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=8.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #241 safest of 330 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in North Carolina.

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center
Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Bosch Rexroth Logistics Center has fewer employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.3 6.2 4 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.5 5.0 3 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Charlotte

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Book Fairs - Chicago 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30416 CAPSTONE - DOLLAR GENERAL JACKSON GA 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dothan warehouse Freezer 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kann Enterprises Inc Cooper CA 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAR Greenhouse LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River CT/CC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE hep Petra, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR War Memorial Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 226 East 27th Street 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 918 Altamonte Mall 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 541 Joliet, Il 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0000000175 Quickchek Food Store 175 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Saint Charles 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 000000146g Quickchek Food Store 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 000000142g Quickchek Food Store 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.