Equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), primarily leasing real estate (except residential buildings and dwellings, nonresidential buildings, miniwarehouses, and self-storage units) · Massachusetts

Boston

Somerville, MA · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boston runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), primarily leasing real estate (except residential buildings and dwellings, nonresidential buildings, miniwarehouses, and self-storage units) workplace, earning a grade A.

Boston: 0.7 TCR = 49% of Equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), primarily leasing real estate (except residential buildings and dwellings, nonresidential buildings, miniwarehouses, and self-storage units) BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boston safety composite

Boston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2017→2024

Boston injury rate improved

Boston's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531190 · Somerville, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P82
  • PHOTO Orlando Call Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orlando Call Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Boston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boston averages 0.7 TCR (49% of the Equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), primarily leasing real estate (except residential buildings and dwellings, nonresidential buildings, miniwarehouses, and self-storage units) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boston TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Boston falls in its industry

87 Equity real estate investment establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Boston (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Boston
Boston (30 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Boston has fewer employees than the Equity real estate investment trusts (RE median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531190 · MA · Somerville

87 Equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), primarily leasing real estate (except residential buildings and dwellings, nonresidential buildings, miniwarehouses, and self-storage units) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 67 employers in Somerville, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orlando Call Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV - All Operations Except Ballpark and HOA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equinix DA1, DA2, DA3, DA6 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tampa Regional Office 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Best Bees Company 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Wareham 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kneeland 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lagasse Group, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass General Brigham Inc 7,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Partners Community Physicians Organization 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cataldo Somerville 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR AllWays Health Partners 486 FTE
NAT-TCR White Bear Lake 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tnt Industrial Contractors, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fennell Industries, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belden Construction LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE C & M Machining LP 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lassens LaBrea 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hard Anodize, Inc 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.