Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass · Iowa

Bovard Studio, Inc.

Fairfield, IA · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bovard Studio, Inc. runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade F.

Bovard Studio, Inc.: 8.2 TCR = 247% of Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bovard Studio, Inc. safety composite

Bovard Studio, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bovard Studio, Inc.: 2.3 → 17.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 17.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Bovard Studio, Inc.'s TCR rose 15.1 from 2.3 in 2016 to 17.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Fairfield, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 247% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Worldwide Glass Reso…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Worldwide Glass Resources, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Bovard Studio, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bovard Studio, Inc. averages 8.2 TCR (247% of the Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bovard Studio, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=13.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=17.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Bovard Studio, Inc. falls in its industry

441 Insulating glass, sealed units establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Insulating glass, sealed units employers in Iowa.

Bovard Studio, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bovard Studio, Inc.
Bovard Studio, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bovard Studio, Inc. has fewer employees than the Insulating glass, sealed units, made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.4 0.0 3 0 0
2023 6.9 0.0 3 0 0
2022 5.3 2.6 2 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 13.5 5.4 5 0 0
2017 15.6 6.7 7 0 0
2016 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · IA · Fairfield

441 Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 30 employers in Fairfield, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Worldwide Glass Resources, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Aggregates Eddystone 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Brands, Inc. - NBV 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Shower Door of Florida 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centrum Valley Farms North 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koester Construction Company Incorporated 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Contracting Services 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eneric Petroleum Corp 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maharishi International University (MIU) 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Health Center 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dexter Laundry Inc 228 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Grants Pass 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Zak Dirt, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dominion Frankfort, LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR L.J. Construction, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE McKay's Market Myrtle Point #7 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE D86 Portland 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 03LR 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.