Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Virginia

Bowhead Mission Solutions

Springfield, VA · ~215 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bowhead Mission Solutions runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Bowhead Mission Solutions: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bowhead Mission Solutions safety composite

Bowhead Mission Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bowhead Mission Solutions held a steady TCR band

Bowhead Mission Solutions's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Springfield, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Securaplane Technolo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Securaplane Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Bowhead Mission Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bowhead Mission Solutions averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bowhead Mission Solutions TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bowhead Mission Solutions falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Virginia.

Bowhead Mission Solutions (215 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bowhead Mission Solutions
Bowhead Mission Solutions (215 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Bowhead Mission Solutions has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · VA · Springfield

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 117 employers in Springfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Securaplane Technologies 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany Engineered Composites 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stark Aerospace 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGAS-Y798 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3495-50CG100 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3869 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2662 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCA-GROUND OPS 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UVA1 1,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Energy Zone Center 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCPS - Food and Nutrition Services 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenspring Village 957 FTE
NAT-TCR RedGuard - Headquarters 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kentwood DC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Headquarters 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HC Company, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fort Scott 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 0 (Corporate) 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalispell Plywood 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mueller Brass Company 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.