Ship repair done in a shipyard · Virginia

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions

Springfield, VA · ~157 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ship repair done in a shipyard workplace, earning a grade B.

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions safety composite

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.85× in 2024

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Springfield, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #28/73
  • PHOTO Superior Shipyard an…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Shipyard and Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Ship repair done in a shipyard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions falls in its industry

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 73 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers in Virginia.

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions (157 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions
Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions (157 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bowhead Operations and Maintenance Solutions has more employees than the Ship repair done in a shipyard median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 7 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 3 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 8 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 3.0 2.5 6 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · VA · Springfield

454 Ship repair done in a shipyard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 117 employers in Springfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Shipyard and Fabrication 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GulfShip LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mount Vernon Land 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR C & C Marine and Repair, LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washington Gas Light Energy Services & Systems - Tysons Office 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Moriarty & Associates, Inc. (VA/DC) 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mathers Construction Company 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Hillsville VA 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UVA1 1,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Energy Zone Center 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCPS - Food and Nutrition Services 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenspring Village 957 FTE
NAT-TCR Metform LLC / Machined Components 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR FoodTown #208 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR UBF 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coconut Creek 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mascot 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woods Construction, Inc. 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rain Bird Corporation Steele 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE SalonCentric Inc. - La Vista Distribution 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.