Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture · Kentucky

Bowling Green Assembly

Bowling Green, KY · ~1,199 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bowling Green Assembly runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade D.

Bowling Green Assembly: 4.2 TCR = 127% of Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bowling Green Assembly safety composite

Bowling Green Assembly scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bowling Green Assembly: 2.4 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2024

Bowling Green Assembly's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.4 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Bowling Green, KY ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO LW Engineering Plant…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 333 inj
  • SIZE ~1,199 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LW Engineering Plant 10 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Bowling Green Assembly in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bowling Green Assembly averages 4.2 TCR (127% of the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bowling Green Assembly TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2018=3 · 2019=2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=7 · 2022=5 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Bowling Green Assembly falls in its industry

158 Assembly plants, passenger car establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Assembly plants, passenger car employers in Kentucky.

Bowling Green Assembly (1,199 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bowling Green Assembly
Bowling Green Assembly (1,199 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Bowling Green Assembly has more employees than the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chass median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 4.8 65 2 0
2023 4.5 3.9 66 2 0
2022 5.0 4.6 52 4 0
2021 7.0 5.6 70 2 0
2020 4.2 3.7 37 0 0
2019 2.0 1.2 11 3 0
2018 3.0 2.8 18 5 0
2016 2.4 1.8 14 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · KY · Bowling Green

158 Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LW Engineering Plant 10 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR F and P America, Troy 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mobis Ohio Plant 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE JBS 1,200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany Plant 1,193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baptist Health Deaconess 1,214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Processing Plant Poultry 1,221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Ndx Davis 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Expert Insulation Brainerd 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Festool USA Lebanon IN 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HK Kolmar USA 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air Corp, Food And Care Division 1,199 FTE
NAT-SIZE AVP2 1,199 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Hills Hospital & Medical Center 1,199 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wish Farms CA - Santa Maria 1,199 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.