Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · Georgia

Braddock Metallurgical-GA

Atlanta, GA · ~20 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Braddock Metallurgical-GA runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Braddock Metallurgical-GA: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Braddock Metallurgical-GA safety composite

Braddock Metallurgical-GA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2019

Braddock Metallurgical-GA injury rate improved

Braddock Metallurgical-GA's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Nitrex, Inc. - NV Op…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nitrex, Inc. - NV Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Braddock Metallurgical-GA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Braddock Metallurgical-GA averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Braddock Metallurgical-GA TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Braddock Metallurgical-GA falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in Georgia.

Braddock Metallurgical-GA (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Braddock Metallurgical-GA
Braddock Metallurgical-GA (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Braddock Metallurgical-GA has fewer employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · GA · Atlanta

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nitrex, Inc. - NV Operations 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zion Industries - Valley City 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wall Colmonoy - Aerobraze Division 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods St George 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lab 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUNSTON GIN 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennington Seed - Seed Production Division (SPI) 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR NDX Green 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MVP Tuscumbia 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AH Avera Queen of Peace 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisonburg South Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roberts Hawaii Hotels 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites Minneapolis--St. Paul Airport 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Des Moines Goodwill 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTSNO 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.