Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) · Virginia

Breezeline - Warsaw

Warsaw, VA · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Breezeline - Warsaw runs at 381% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Breezeline - Warsaw: 2.7 TCR = 381% of Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Breezeline - Warsaw safety composite

Breezeline - Warsaw scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Breezeline - Warsaw: 0.0 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Breezeline - Warsaw's TCR rose 5.3 from 0.0 in 2023 to 5.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Warsaw, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 381% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO UT - Lindon, 542 W 4…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UT - Lindon, 542 W 400 S (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Breezeline - Warsaw in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Breezeline - Warsaw averages 2.7 TCR (381% of the Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Breezeline - Warsaw TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 0.7

Where Breezeline - Warsaw falls in its industry

455 Internet service providers, us establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Internet service providers, us employers in Virginia.

Breezeline - Warsaw (20 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Breezeline - Warsaw
Breezeline - Warsaw (20 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Breezeline - Warsaw has fewer employees than the Internet service providers, using own op median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · VA · Warsaw

455 Internet service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure (e.g., cable, DSL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 13 employers in Warsaw, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UT - Lindon, 542 W 400 S 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALLO Fiber: Hastings 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL - Cape Coral, 1418 SE 10th St 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA - Bellingham, 400 Sequoia Dr 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richmond Hatchery 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richmond Growout 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Gordonsville 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gordonsville 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Neck Senior Care Community 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Orchard 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01196 - STORE # 1196 WARSAW 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1196 62 FTE
NAT-TCR Hickory Specialties DBA Kerry Ingredients 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Applied Physical Metrology Akron 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend Oaks Gladewater 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilgrim's Pride Commerce Hatchery 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wccs-Mchs-640 Old Cain Ridge Road 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weelborg Chevrolet of Glencoe, LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Eye Farms Blackfoot 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Dismantling LLC. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.