Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction · Oregon

Brent Woodward Inc

Redmond, OR · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brent Woodward Inc runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Brent Woodward Inc: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brent Woodward Inc safety composite

Brent Woodward Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2022

Brent Woodward Inc injury rate improved

Brent Woodward Inc's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Redmond, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/28
  • PHOTO Five Star Energy Ser…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Five Star Energy Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Brent Woodward Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brent Woodward Inc averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brent Woodward Inc TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Brent Woodward Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Substation and switching stati establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 28 Substation and switching stati employers in Oregon.

Brent Woodward Inc (35 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brent Woodward Inc
Brent Woodward Inc (35 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Brent Woodward Inc has fewer employees than the Substation and switching station, power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OR · Redmond

1,605 Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 90 employers in Redmond, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Five Star Energy Services, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linetec Services LLC - West Distribution 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR U Tec Construction Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Pacific Energy, Inc- CA- Elk Grove 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schanno-McClaskey Orchards, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom Nursery Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Rio Farms 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redmond Maint HQ 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond School District 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR BasX Solutions 483 FTE
NAT-TCR United Refrigeration Inc. (A0) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Parke House Academy, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 550 - Baybrook 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Edmond Clinic 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Setco Automotive, N.A., Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1419 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rutherford B Hayes Pres Lib & Museums 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply One 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.