Janitorial services · Wisconsin

Bretting Development Corporation Inc.

Ashland, WI · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade B.

Bretting Development Corporation Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 54% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. safety composite

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2016→2024

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. injury rate improved

Bretting Development Corporation Inc.'s TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Ashland, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/83
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT MERCK MILL…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT MERCK MILLSBORO SOFT SERVICES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bretting Development Corporation Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (54% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Bretting Development Corporation Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 83 Janitorial services employers in Wisconsin.

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bretting Development Corporation Inc.
Bretting Development Corporation Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Bretting Development Corporation Inc. has fewer employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 10.7 10.7 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · WI · Ashland

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 38 employers in Ashland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MERCK MILLSBORO SOFT SERVICES 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshfield Medical Ctr-Weston 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bixler Corporation 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Drumlin Dairy, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrillan East Coating 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant-5D 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Company Inc. 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Clearing Inc. 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1672 247 FTE
NAT-TCR Magnetic Inspection Laboratory, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunoco Transportation Texas 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Candle-lite, Company 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Prevost - South Plainfield, NJ 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grabill 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Children's Hospital Colorado - Wheatridge 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leppert Machine Co Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE SKC Construction Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.