Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton

Clayton, NC · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton: 10.7 TCR = 165% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton safety composite

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 32.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton: 3.9 → 32.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 32.5 TCR · DART/TCR 3.03× in 2021

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton's TCR rose 28.6 from 3.9 in 2016 to 32.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 3.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Clayton, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.7 · 165% of ind

  • DART 32.5 DART
  • RANK #395/510
  • PHOTO Fairview Care Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fairview Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton averages 10.7 TCR (165% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=8 · 2020=3 · 2021=32.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #395 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton (91 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton
Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton (91 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Clayton has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 32.5 32.5 6 12 0
2020 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2019 8.0 8.0 6 0 0
2018 6.5 3.9 5 0 0
2017 10.4 2.6 7 1 0
2016 3.9 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Clayton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fairview Care Center 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALARIS HEALTH AT HAMILTON PARK 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carmel Hills Care Center 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Balmoral Home Inc 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri-hishtil, Llc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brother Construction LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triple-R Electric, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRS Sesco 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Benhaven Inc 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWAS 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1030 - West Colorado Springs Co Whse 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-01077 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 159 Minneapolis Gallery 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division #11 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunshine Electronic Display Corporation 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continuing Healthcare of Gahanna 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.