Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe

Monroe, NC · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe: 2.9 TCR = 45% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe safety composite

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe held a steady TCR band

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Monroe, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 45% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #84/510
  • PHOTO Opelousas Health Car…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Opelousas Health Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe averages 2.9 TCR (45% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=2.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe (64 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe
Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe (64 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Brian Center Health & Retirement/Monroe has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Monroe

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 163 employers in Monroe, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Opelousas Health Care Properties, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview at the Park Care and Rehabilitation Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHSCM14 ASCENSION LIVING NAZARETHVILLE PLACE 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarksdale Nursing Center 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agrarian Inc 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilmington Eastern Region Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Randolph Electric Membership Corporation 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apex Operations Center 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monroe Plant 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-CHS Union 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0060-Atrium Health Union 1,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108-Atrium Health Union (1108) 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Clarke Power Services Memphis 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AAH Dougherty Hospice House 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Meter Department 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR D & J Electric 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garman Builders, Inc. office 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electrical Contractor 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mack StressCon 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Emc - Gainesville 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.