Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center

Tucker, GA · ~97 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center: 6.2 TCR = 96% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center: 0.0 → 21.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3.48× in 2021

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 21.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 21.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 3.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Tucker, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 21.6 DART
  • RANK #102/259
  • PHOTO Cypress Pointe Rehab…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 6.2 TCR (96% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=8.6 · 2021=21.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center (97 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center
Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center (97 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Briarwood Health and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.6 21.6 1 15 0
2020 8.6 5.7 4 2 0
2019 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2018 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Tucker

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 132 employers in Tucker, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blueberry Hill Operator. LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Blvd Nursing Home, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agnesian St. Francis Home 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Atlanta West 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morrow Construction Co Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Sheeting & Shoring 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Mechanical Inc 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Ortho and Spine Hospital - EHC 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Williams Plant Services, LLC (All Locations) 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA.TUCKE.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc 445 FTE
NAT-TCR 90 - Waudena 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waterford at Roxbury Park 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Canton Manor 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Guarantee Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE LCD Elevator Repair, Inc 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recycled Wood Products 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bi-Rite Market 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Health & Social Services (8) 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.