Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · New York

Bridge Components

Sanborn, NY · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridge Components runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Bridge Components: 1.8 TCR = 53% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridge Components safety composite

Bridge Components scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bridge Components held a steady TCR band

Bridge Components's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Sanborn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO American Alloy Steel…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Alloy Steel 6230 North Houston Rosslyn Houston Tx 77091 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Bridge Components in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridge Components averages 1.8 TCR (53% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bridge Components TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bridge Components falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in New York.

Bridge Components (24 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridge Components
Bridge Components (24 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Bridge Components has fewer employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.5 10.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · NY · Sanborn

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 26 employers in Sanborn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Alloy Steel 6230 North Houston Rosslyn Houston Tx 77091 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovation Way 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport News Industrial - OPIP 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MaxSteel Fabrication, LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bittner Singer Orchards 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Organic Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawnel Farms 2 LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dairy 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Vacuum Niagara 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Vacuum North American Customer Center - General Vacuum 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Voss Manufacturing Inc 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACA-New York 81 FTE
NAT-TCR US - Branch Network : 0594 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Branch Network : 0499 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 742 District Services Building 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spotsylvania Solar SPower 18145011 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE US - Branch Network : 0610 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Branch Network : 0504 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Branch Network : 0482 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Branch Network : 0463 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.