Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Texas

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites

Houston, TX · ~94 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade A.

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites: 0.7 TCR = 10% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites safety composite

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

85/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites held a steady TCR band

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/1034
  • PHOTO Resource Center
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resource Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites averages 0.7 TCR (10% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 1034 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Texas.

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites (94 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites
Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites (94 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Houston

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resource Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Resorts at Chester River Manor 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norwich Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway Nursing Home 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arlington #135 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 757 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE 767 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE AELL-DHX3 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Avangrid Service Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Silco Fire & Security - Cleveland 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Seminole Location 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rexa, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE CareGivers America LLC Selinsgrove 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE E. 16th St 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE 49992 - Arizona Service Center Fac. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE LA AFB Facility Maintenance 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.