Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Bridges of Hendricks Creek

Tarboro, NC · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bridges of Hendricks Creek runs at 335% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bridges of Hendricks Creek: 12.7 TCR = 335% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bridges of Hendricks Creek safety composite

Bridges of Hendricks Creek scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2022→2024

Bridges of Hendricks Creek injury rate improved

Bridges of Hendricks Creek's TCR fell 1.9 from 10.6 in 2022 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.6 · 2023=19.0 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tarboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 335% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #319/356
  • PHOTO The Cottages At Mead…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Cottages At Meadowlands (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Bridges of Hendricks Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bridges of Hendricks Creek averages 12.7 TCR (335% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bridges of Hendricks Creek TCR series: 2022=10.6 · 2023=19 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Bridges of Hendricks Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #319 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Bridges of Hendricks Creek (38 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bridges of Hendricks Creek
Bridges of Hendricks Creek (38 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bridges of Hendricks Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 19.0 7.6 5 0 0
2022 10.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Tarboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 46 employers in Tarboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Cottages At Meadowlands 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cherry Hill AL 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Lakeside IL 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Falls Labor, LLC 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Edgecombe Hospital 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Edgecombe Hospital 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keihin Carolina System Technology 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hitachi Astemo Greenfield LLC 348 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DBU1 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Steel & Pipe Supply Inc 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland Fresh Kitchen Manufacturing 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Patwn - East Zone Regional Hub 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Altorfer Inc. - Davenport, IA - 4712 Buckeye Street 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nowland Associates, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auer Steel & Heating Supply - NNH 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trestlewood Blackfoot 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.