Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Utah

Brigham

Brigham City, UT · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brigham runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Brigham: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brigham safety composite

Brigham scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2024

Brigham injury rate improved

Brigham's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Brigham City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/33
  • PHOTO Nevada Region
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nevada Region (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Brigham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brigham averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brigham TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Brigham falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 33 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Utah.

Brigham (56 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Brigham
Brigham (56 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Brigham has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · UT · Brigham City

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 23 employers in Brigham City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nevada Region 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR T & M Asphalt Paving, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shelly Company - Southern Division Construction and Operations 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rieth-Riley - Goshen 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mountainland Apples, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Building Supply - American Fork #863 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2453-00060368-60368 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. George Steel LLC 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northrop Grumman/Propulsion Systems - Promontory 1,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoliv Brigham City 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitaker Construction Co. 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Associated Brigham Contractors 555 FTE
NAT-TCR DuPont Spruance Plant 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR New South Companies, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- St. Louis Facility 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Acoustic Ceiling & Partition Company, Inc. dba Arbor Construction Personell 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matrix HG, Inc. Novato 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 212TRH 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Glass and Mirror 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.