Home care of elderly, medical · North Carolina

Brightmore of South Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~69 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brightmore of South Charlotte runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Home care of elderly, medical workplace, earning a grade B.

Brightmore of South Charlotte: 3.5 TCR = 67% of Home care of elderly, medical BLS 5.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brightmore of South Charlotte safety composite

Brightmore of South Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2024

Brightmore of South Charlotte injury rate improved

Brightmore of South Charlotte's TCR fell 2.9 from 5.1 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #81/196
  • PHOTO Area Agency on Aging…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Area Agency on Aging of Western AR, Inc. Fort Smith Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brightmore of South Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brightmore of South Charlotte averages 3.5 TCR (67% of the Home care of elderly, medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brightmore of South Charlotte TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 5.2

Where Brightmore of South Charlotte falls in its industry

3,635 Home care of elderly, medical establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 196 Home care of elderly, medical employers in North Carolina.

Brightmore of South Charlotte (69 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brightmore of South Charlotte
Brightmore of South Charlotte (69 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Brightmore of South Charlotte has fewer employees than the Home care of elderly, medical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 5.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · NC · Charlotte

3,635 Home care of elderly, medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Area Agency on Aging of Western AR, Inc. Fort Smith Office 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Care at Home (30068) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2032-08680469 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewood - WA 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE APEX OPERATIONS 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH RALEIGH OPERATIONS 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Regional Water & Sewer H2GO 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease - Charlotte Office 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Metro Machine, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PJS of Texas 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Smithfield 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn College Station 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fitzpatrick Mfg. Co. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Kingman Parks & Recreation 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBC Associates, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crescent Food Corp. 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.