Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing · Ohio

Brighton

Cincinnati, OH · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brighton runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Brighton: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brighton safety composite

Brighton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2023

Brighton injury rate improved

Brighton's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #9/38
  • PHOTO KSO MetalFab, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KSO MetalFab, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Brighton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brighton averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brighton TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Brighton falls in its industry

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 38 Plate work (e.g., bending, cut employers in Ohio.

Brighton (89 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brighton
Brighton (89 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Brighton has more employees than the Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2021 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · OH · Cincinnati

449 Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KSO MetalFab, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Manufacturing, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plate work (e.g., bending, cutting, punching, shaping, welding), fabricated metal, manufacturing 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR USW - Tualatin 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mimi Farms Inc. dba Mucci Farms Ohio 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE System Office - Piketon 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Professional Restoration Service Inc 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105609 - Ross and Fayette 222MWdc Solar 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Gonzalez Production Systems Pontiac (main) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid Metro 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SAO : LSM - Sandy Creek 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Koppers Millington Transportation 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Twin Lake Trucking, Ltd 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE UDC Corporation 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. O. Harrell, Inc. - South Boston, Virginia 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTI Polymer 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.