Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Ohio

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc

Dayton, OH · ~16 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc safety composite

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc injury rate improved

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/39
  • PHOTO United Die Company, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~16 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Die Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 39 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Ohio.

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc (16 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc
Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc (16 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Brinkman Tool & Die, Inc has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · OH · Dayton

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Die Company, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American International Tooling Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Invio Automation, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sirois Tool Co., Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schlessman Seed Co - Hoover Road 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Vision Farms 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMaster Farms LLC 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley at Lordstown Energy Center LEC 16 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Palm Breezes Home Health Services, LLC DBA Palm Garden Home Health 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro-Tech Cabling Systems, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Steelco Chain Link Fence Erecting Co., Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Structural Technologies #53 2.1 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.