Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Broadmoor Court

Colorado Springs, CO · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broadmoor Court runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Broadmoor Court: 8.8 TCR = 233% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broadmoor Court safety composite

Broadmoor Court scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Broadmoor Court injury rate improved

Broadmoor Court's TCR fell 3.7 from 7.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=16.1 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=13.2 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 233% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/140
  • PHOTO Aspirus Tivoli Commu…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aspirus Tivoli Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Broadmoor Court in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broadmoor Court averages 8.8 TCR (233% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broadmoor Court TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=16.1 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=13.2 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Broadmoor Court falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Broadmoor Court (38 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Broadmoor Court
Broadmoor Court (38 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Broadmoor Court has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.9 3.6 3 0 0
2020 13.2 9.9 4 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2018 12.8 6.4 4 0 0
2017 16.1 6.4 5 0 0
2016 7.4 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Colorado Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aspirus Tivoli Community 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Five Star Residences of Fort Wayne 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valencia Terrace 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale-Monrovia 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE COLORADO PRODUCTION FARMING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nathan Naill, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan County Rural Electric Association 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thrive Home Builders Corporate Office 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR CentraCare Clinic Big Lake 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR S09802 - WM Recycling Brevard 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vernon Plant 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Easton Block & Supply 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marble Today Palatka 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edro Specialty Steel Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laufer Trucking, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix, AZ - 625 S 27th Avenue 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.