Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · Minnesota

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC

Minneapolis, MN · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade F.

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC: 8.8 TCR = 339% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC safety composite

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC: 8.1 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2021

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC's TCR rose 1.3 from 8.1 in 2017 to 9.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 339% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO S09802 - WM Recyclin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S09802 - WM Recycling Brevard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC averages 8.8 TCR (339% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC TCR series: 2017=8.1 · 2018=9 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=9.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Materials recovery facilities employers in Minnesota.

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC (22 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC
Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC (22 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Broadway Resource Recovery, LLC has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.5 9.5 1 0 0
2020 9.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 8.1 4.1 2 0 0
2018 9.0 0.0 3 0 0
2017 8.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · MN · Minneapolis

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S09802 - WM Recycling Brevard 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims Recycling Solutions 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parallel Products of Florida 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Fe Springs 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10145) 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit 10: Fire Protection 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR APP Anacortes 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott Ellis Enterprises 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHR-Brook House 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHR-Grant House 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHR- Mills House 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Clinic 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.