Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing · Minnesota

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc.

Pine City, MN · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. runs at 448% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc.: 14.8 TCR = 448% of Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. safety composite

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc.: 17.3 → 18.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 18.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2022

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 17.3 in 2018 to 18.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Pine City, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 448% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO Harriston Industries
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harriston Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. averages 14.8 TCR (448% of the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. TCR series: 2018=17.3 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=12.4 · 2021=15.2 · 2022=18.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. falls in its industry

433 Harvesting machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Harvesting machinery and equip employers in Minnesota.

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Broekema Beltway USA, Inc.
Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. has fewer employees than the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agri median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 18.7 4.2 9 0 0
2021 15.2 1.9 7 1 0
2020 12.4 7.1 6 1 0
2019 10.4 10.4 5 1 0
2018 17.3 5.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · MN · Pine City

433 Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Pine City, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harriston Industries 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spudnik Equipment Company - Blackfoot Location 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux Bins 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ritchie Industries Inc. 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Ottawa 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeder Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Facility 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maertens- Brenny Construction Company 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2367 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2367 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 578 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Technical and Community College 150 FTE
NAT-TCR TrafFix Devices, Inc. Coast Rubber Division 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 054551-Lax-Rimpau Sta 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando DC 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tetherow Golf Course 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE KVH Home Health & Hospice/ Pt Finan Services 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Military & Veterans Affairs (10) 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Currency Bureau of Engraving Facility Maintenance 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8342 Carrier Florida 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.