Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Brookdale Attleboro

Attleboro, MA · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Attleboro runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Attleboro: 7.6 TCR = 200% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Attleboro safety composite

Brookdale Attleboro scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−53.1

2016→2024

Brookdale Attleboro injury rate improved

Brookdale Attleboro's TCR fell 53.1 from 61.3 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 61.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=61.3 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=11.7 · 2024=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Attleboro, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.6 · 200% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #98/210
  • PHOTO 62024 BRIGHTON GARDE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 62024 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF WHEATON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Attleboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Attleboro averages 7.6 TCR (200% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Attleboro TCR series: 2016=61.3 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=11.7 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Attleboro falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Brookdale Attleboro (86 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Attleboro
Brookdale Attleboro (86 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Attleboro has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 4.9 5 0 0
2023 11.7 5.0 7 0 0
2022 8.9 1.8 5 0 0
2021 13.1 9.4 7 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.1 0.0 3 0 0
2017 6.2 0.0 2 2 0
2016 61.3 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Attleboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 71 employers in Attleboro, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 62024 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF WHEATON 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creekside on Whipps Mill 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Oklahoma City Southwest 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MITN LLC 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 871-NiSource-Springfield MA-Cust Op Ctr 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Boston 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milltown Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spence & Company 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Health Hospital 2,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sturdy Memorial Hospital 1,750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sensata Technologies, Inc. Attleboro, MA 839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lacerta Group, LLC - 505 Collins St. 689 FTE
NAT-TCR 01071-01-01-YAKIMA 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Imperial Industries Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stoutco Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LAC Enterprises, Inc. dba Windsor Companies 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Polyzen LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aero-Tech Engineering 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Meadows 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nickell Company LLC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.