Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Brookdale Columbus

Columbus, GA · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Columbus runs at 495% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Columbus: 18.8 TCR = 495% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Columbus safety composite

Brookdale Columbus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2018→2022

Brookdale Columbus injury rate improved

Brookdale Columbus's TCR fell 10.5 from 25.2 in 2018 to 14.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 25.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=25.2 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=20.2 · 2022=14.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 495% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #195/205
  • PHOTO Brookdale Olympia East
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Olympia East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Columbus averages 18.8 TCR (495% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Columbus TCR series: 2018=25.2 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=20.2 · 2022=14.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Columbus falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #195 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Brookdale Columbus (31 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Columbus
Brookdale Columbus (31 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Columbus has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.6 3.7 4 0 0
2020 20.2 8.1 4 1 0
2019 15.3 15.3 4 0 0
2018 25.2 18.0 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Olympia East 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MorningStar of Idaho Falls 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pearl at Dallas 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Gardens Senior Living 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wade Plantation LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clover Leaf Gin Inc. Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Arlington Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton GA 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Parts Authority Pico Rivera 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR La Jolla Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bria Health Services 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Propak - Porterville, CA 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pine Creek Nursing and Rehab 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skinner Roofing 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE RelianceCM, LLC. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Copper River Princess Wilderness Lodge 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.