Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Brookdale Fairhaven

Bellingham, WA · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Fairhaven runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Fairhaven: 6.1 TCR = 160% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Fairhaven safety composite

Brookdale Fairhaven scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Fairhaven: 3.7 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

Brookdale Fairhaven's TCR rose 3.7 from 3.7 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bellingham, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 160% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #59/216
  • PHOTO Eden Estates
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eden Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Fairhaven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Fairhaven averages 6.1 TCR (160% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Fairhaven TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=15.2 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Fairhaven falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Brookdale Fairhaven (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Fairhaven
Brookdale Fairhaven (34 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Fairhaven has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 2 0 0
2023 15.2 15.2 4 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 2 0 0
2021 7.5 3.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Bellingham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 210 employers in Bellingham, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eden Estates 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carillon at Belleview Station 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10960 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE M & G Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dobbe Farms, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benjert Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kettle Falls Logging - WP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Washington University 3,794 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Medical Center Main Campus 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Operations - Matrix Service Inc. 2,063 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG SJMC Clinics 864 FTE
NAT-TCR Ryerson Lancaster 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cobre Valley Regional Medical Center 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Beach Blvd 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metalworks, Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE A.M. Logging, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Park Residences, LP 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honeybear Marketing LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hart County Ambulance Service 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.