Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Brookdale Hawthorne Park

Greenville, SC · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Hawthorne Park runs at 534% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Hawthorne Park: 20.3 TCR = 534% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Hawthorne Park safety composite

Brookdale Hawthorne Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Hawthorne Park: 16.6 → 24.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 24.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2018

Brookdale Hawthorne Park's TCR rose 7.4 from 16.6 in 2017 to 24.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.3 · 534% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #100/107
  • PHOTO Spring Hills Assiste…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Hills Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Hawthorne Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Hawthorne Park averages 20.3 TCR (534% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Hawthorne Park TCR series: 2017=16.6 · 2018=24 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Hawthorne Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Brookdale Hawthorne Park (30 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Hawthorne Park
Brookdale Hawthorne Park (30 employees, TCR 20.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Hawthorne Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 24.0 8.0 6 0 0
2017 16.6 16.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Greenville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Hills Assisted Living 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gables of Idaho Falls 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cotswold 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Paine Estate 20.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENMARK DISTRICT OFFICE 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood Operations Center 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center - PNG 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730043-CS 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Shellfish Grays Harbor LLC 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0005-0005-01438 20.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Pulp Mills Inc. 20.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn by Marriott Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dyersburg, Tn 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Homestore (60) 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conley Terminal 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.