Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale High Point North MC

High Point, NC · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale High Point North MC runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale High Point North MC: 10.5 TCR = 276% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale High Point North MC safety composite

Brookdale High Point North MC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.8

2016→2019

Brookdale High Point North MC injury rate improved

Brookdale High Point North MC's TCR fell 21.8 from 24.6 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · High Point, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 276% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #287/356
  • PHOTO Atria on the Hudson
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atria on the Hudson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale High Point North MC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale High Point North MC averages 10.5 TCR (276% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale High Point North MC TCR series: 2016=24.6 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale High Point North MC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #287 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale High Point North MC (41 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale High Point North MC
Brookdale High Point North MC (41 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale High Point North MC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 11.4 2.9 4 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 24.6 0.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · High Point

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atria on the Hudson 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Creek Inn 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF RICHMOND 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sarabella Senior Living 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Barnes LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandhill Turf 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston NC Operation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendersonville Operations Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0005 2824 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Starnet Emergency Services 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Triad Ohio 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #576 (Alpine, TX) 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE NDX DH Baker 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 31 Clinton St. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE GES 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE USE - Pearson 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.