Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Brookdale Phillippi Creek

Sarasota, FL · ~44 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Phillippi Creek runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Phillippi Creek: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Phillippi Creek safety composite

Brookdale Phillippi Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Phillippi Creek: 5.0 → 7.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2022

Brookdale Phillippi Creek's TCR rose 2.5 from 5.0 in 2019 to 7.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #245/396
  • PHOTO Commonwealth Senior …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Phillippi Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Phillippi Creek averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Phillippi Creek TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=18.1 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Phillippi Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #245 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Brookdale Phillippi Creek (44 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Phillippi Creek
Brookdale Phillippi Creek (44 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Phillippi Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.5 7.5 3 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 18.1 13.6 8 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Sarasota

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Churchland House 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cypress Place 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tanque Verde 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10737 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HICKORY GROVE 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Aquatic Plant Nursery LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRV Plant Riviera 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope Power Company 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Probation Department 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Less Foods #9 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Omaha 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jenco Plating Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pavement Marking Division 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Neumann University - Res Dinin 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Paul Smith'S College-Dining 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madern USA, Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.