Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

Brookdale Piqua

Piqua, OH · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Piqua runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Brookdale Piqua: 2.1 TCR = 57% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Piqua safety composite

Brookdale Piqua scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2016→2023

Brookdale Piqua injury rate improved

Brookdale Piqua's TCR fell 12.7 from 12.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.7 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Piqua, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/243
  • PHOTO Waltonwood Management
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waltonwood Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Piqua in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Piqua averages 2.1 TCR (57% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Piqua TCR series: 2016=12.7 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Piqua falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Brookdale Piqua (29 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Piqua
Brookdale Piqua (29 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Piqua has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.5 0.0 0 1 0
2016 12.7 12.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Piqua

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 65 employers in Piqua, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Management 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingston Residence of Sylvania 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62057 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF MIDDLETOWN 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Hampton 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Union City Facility 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breeder Division Field Office 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plibrico Refractories LLC - Oak Hill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanging Rock Energy Facility 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evenflo Company 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps and Systems 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crane Pumps & Systems Piqua 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3765 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Santa Teresa - UP 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Associates, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckley Associates Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elk Grove Old Town Tap Depot 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Meadows of Franklin Grove 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tweed New Haven Airport 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carris Health - New London Clinic 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Autoforce Skokie 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.