Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose

Scappoose, OR · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose runs at 775% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose: 29.4 TCR = 775% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose safety composite

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose: 17.4 → 41.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 41.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2020

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose's TCR rose 24.0 from 17.4 in 2017 to 41.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Scappoose, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 29.4 · 775% of ind

  • DART 24.2 DART
  • RANK #218/218
  • PHOTO Chandler Place Indep…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chandler Place Independent Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose averages 29.4 TCR (775% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose TCR series: 2017=17.4 · 2020=41.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #218 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose (34 employees, TCR 29.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose
Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose (34 employees, TCR 29.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 41.5 24.2 5 7 0
2017 17.4 13.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Scappoose

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 15 employers in Scappoose, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP Chesterfield Township Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at New Baltimore 29.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cranberry Court 29.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gabriel Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Family Orchards LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sage Hollow Ranch 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkton 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00462 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR Means Nursery, Inc. 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon Converting 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Headquarters 57 FTE
NAT-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BDL - Ground Ops 29.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellingham Horizon 29.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Settlement Home for Children 29.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Famous Dave's - Coon Rapids 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waco 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administrative Services 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Irvine Residential Admin 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.