Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

Brookdale Russellville

Russellville, AR · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Russellville runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Russellville: 7.3 TCR = 193% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Russellville safety composite

Brookdale Russellville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2016→2024

Brookdale Russellville injury rate improved

Brookdale Russellville's TCR fell 9.3 from 9.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=21.9 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=18.8 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Russellville, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 193% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/51
  • PHOTO Cadence at Mint Hill
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cadence at Mint Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Russellville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Russellville averages 7.3 TCR (193% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Russellville TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=21.9 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=18.8 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Russellville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

Brookdale Russellville (35 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Russellville
Brookdale Russellville (35 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Russellville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 5.7 5.7 2 0 0
2019 18.8 3.1 6 0 0
2018 6.6 3.3 2 0 0
2017 21.9 3.1 7 0 0
2016 9.3 9.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Russellville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 113 employers in Russellville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Mint Hill 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60083 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Francis Villa Assisted Living 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60091 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE England Farms 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fayetteville Hatchery (CV) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hope Hatchery 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springdale Growout 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Russellville,AR 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Nuclear One 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Road Plant 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transco Lines, Inc 586 FTE
NAT-TCR Stark Truss Co., Inc. Covington, Georgia 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Runnings of Vermillion 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Counties Cooperative 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 10541 East Lansing 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maryland Portable Concrete Elkton Plant 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Jacobs Institute, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson House 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE WL Port-Land Systems, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.