Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Brookdale San Marcos

San Marcos, CA · ~86 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale San Marcos runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale San Marcos: 5.1 TCR = 134% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale San Marcos safety composite

Brookdale San Marcos scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2017→2023

Brookdale San Marcos injury rate improved

Brookdale San Marcos's TCR fell 4.2 from 5.7 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Marcos, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 134% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #111/635
  • PHOTO Isle at Watercrest B…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Isle at Watercrest Bryan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale San Marcos in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale San Marcos averages 5.1 TCR (134% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale San Marcos TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale San Marcos falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Brookdale San Marcos (86 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale San Marcos
Brookdale San Marcos (86 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale San Marcos has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2021 7.7 7.7 5 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 7.8 2.6 6 0 0
2018 6.9 4.2 5 0 0
2017 5.7 2.9 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Marcos

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 139 employers in San Marcos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Isle at Watercrest Bryan 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Belden Village 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Roseboro 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colonnade at Beckett Lake 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MALAGA HARVEST SHOP 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Muller Ranch, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE OXNARD TERRACE 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Farms 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Industries 967 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08180552 SAN MARCOS MEDICAL CENTER 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR CASMR - SAN MARCOS 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAN MARCOS (CASMR) 555 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1106 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Steele Solutions Inc - South Milwaukee 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR County Market #231 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Paddywax, LLC Factory 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Missouri Valley Plant 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tony DePaul and Son 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apex Home Health 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berkshire Investments, LLC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.