Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Brookdale Scotts Valley

Scotts Valley, CA · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Scotts Valley runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Scotts Valley: 9.1 TCR = 240% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Scotts Valley safety composite

Brookdale Scotts Valley scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2017→2024

Brookdale Scotts Valley injury rate improved

Brookdale Scotts Valley's TCR fell 11.7 from 16.9 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.9 · 2020=5.2 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Scotts Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 240% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #312/635
  • PHOTO Village on the Park …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village on the Park Steeplechase (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Scotts Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Scotts Valley averages 9.1 TCR (240% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Scotts Valley TCR series: 2017=16.9 · 2020=5.2 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Scotts Valley falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #312 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Brookdale Scotts Valley (79 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Scotts Valley
Brookdale Scotts Valley (79 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Scotts Valley has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 5.2 3.5 2 1 0
2017 16.9 9.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Scotts Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Scotts Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village on the Park Steeplechase 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley View Assisted Living and Memory Care 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medina, Elmcroft of 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBRF - DePere 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Threshold Enterprises 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central California Alliance for Health Scotts Valley 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Photo, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zero Motorcycles inc. 302 FTE
NAT-TCR Invest Cast Inc 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Milro NY - Freeport 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux City Emergency Medical Services 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Dodge Ia - 3134 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quality Life Services Markleysburg 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwich Springs Health Campus 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE AirBoss Rubber Compounding (NC) LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nathan H. Kelman, Inc. 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.