Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Brookdale University PArk

Denver, CO · ~103 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale University PArk runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale University PArk: 7.5 TCR = 198% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale University PArk safety composite

Brookdale University PArk scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2016→2024

Brookdale University PArk injury rate improved

Brookdale University PArk's TCR fell 9.6 from 10.1 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=9.7 · 2019=10.1 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #51/140
  • PHOTO Country Meadows of Y…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Country Meadows of York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale University PArk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale University PArk averages 7.5 TCR (198% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale University PArk TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=9.7 · 2019=10.1 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale University PArk falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Brookdale University PArk (103 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale University PArk
Brookdale University PArk (103 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale University PArk has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 3 0 0
2023 7.2 7.2 4 0 0
2019 10.1 2.2 9 0 0
2017 9.7 0.0 9 0 0
2016 10.1 1.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Denver

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows of York 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Devon Oaks 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Atrium Inn 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Oaks Place Lenoir City 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Farms LLC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Plata Electric Association 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP-SOC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boulder Plant 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Azyum - Yuma 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohcge - Cincinnati 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nemcc - Mc Cook 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Laope - Opelousas 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ryan Logistics 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capstone Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cub Foods Roseville - 5503 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cub Foods Rogers - 5520 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.