Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living

Utica, MI · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living: 1.8 TCR = 47% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living safety composite

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 263.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=263.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Utica, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/201
  • PHOTO Brookdale Cleveland …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Cleveland 17700 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Utica Assisted Living averages 1.8 TCR (47% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=263.2 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Utica Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Utica Assisted Living
Brookdale Utica Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Utica Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 263.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Utica

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 37 employers in Utica, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cleveland 17700 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Queens Adult Care Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Franklin Circle 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elko Health Care, LLC-ALF 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNP corporation 451 FTE
CITY-NEAR 065 - Shelby Twp 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6664 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0278 - Lakeside 203 FTE
NAT-TCR FGG Trinity 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradcon LLC dba: Bradley Concrete 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR General Landscaping LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Neal Blaisdell Waikiki Shell 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bush Foundation 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at So Nassau Comm Hospital 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Wayne County Nursing Home 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mare Solutions, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.