Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookdale Weddington Park

Matthews, NC · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Weddington Park runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Brookdale Weddington Park: 3.5 TCR = 92% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Weddington Park safety composite

Brookdale Weddington Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2024

Brookdale Weddington Park injury rate improved

Brookdale Weddington Park's TCR fell 2.7 from 9.9 in 2017 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Matthews, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 92% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #78/356
  • PHOTO Waters Edge
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waters Edge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Weddington Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Weddington Park averages 3.5 TCR (92% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Weddington Park TCR series: 2017=9.9 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Weddington Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookdale Weddington Park (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Weddington Park
Brookdale Weddington Park (36 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Weddington Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.9 6.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Matthews

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 94 employers in Matthews, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waters Edge 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Trace of Plymouth (1) 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridle Brook Assisted Living & Memory Care Community 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRANDON WOOD RETIREMENT CENTER 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 1 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Farms (CV) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yadkin 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edgecombe Genco, LLC. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Matthews Medical Center 1,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6921-06000 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC201 DC201 MATTHEWS NC 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-DC201 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Accurate Specialty Metal 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR East Arkansas Area Agency on Aging- Greene 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR METALfx 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brainerd Clinic 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Machine Shop, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works - Water Reclamation Plant 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE TK Trading Company dba Storm Creek 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries of South Central California-Warehouse Salvage 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.