Nursing homes · New York

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home

Brooklyn, NY · ~120 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home: 14.8 TCR = 227% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home safety composite

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

7/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home: 8.3 → 22.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 36.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.51× in 2024

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home's TCR rose 14.1 from 8.3 in 2016 to 22.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.8 · 227% of ind

  • DART 22.4 DART
  • RANK #539/616
  • PHOTO Oakbrook Health and …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakbrook Health and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home averages 14.8 TCR (227% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=25.7 · 2022=36.8 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=22.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #539 safest of 616 Nursing homes employers in New York.

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home (120 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home
Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home (120 employees, TCR 14.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Brooklyn Queens Nursing Home has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.4 22.4 8 14 0
2023 9.9 9.9 5 3 0
2022 36.8 36.8 2 28 0
2021 25.7 23.6 12 12 0
2020 11.6 10.8 4 10 1
2019 7.2 7.2 7 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 5 0 0
2017 5.9 5.9 7 0 0
2016 8.3 6.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Brooklyn

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakbrook Health and Rehab 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rainbow Rehabilitation & Healthcare 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prescott SNF Operations LLC 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otterbein Clear Creek 14.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nesbitt Fruit Farms 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Facility Management & Construction Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power Inc-NY-Canton 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peckham Road Corp 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR Furbish Company 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange Park FL 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ilhod - Chicago Area Consolidation Hub 14.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Moxie Pest Control Maryland LLC 14.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saybrook Landing 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTAC 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dot Transportation, Inc. Bear, Delaware 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton BWI Airport 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.