Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Brookstone Haven of Randleman

Randleman, NC · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookstone Haven of Randleman runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookstone Haven of Randleman: 9.4 TCR = 249% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookstone Haven of Randleman safety composite

Brookstone Haven of Randleman scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2019→2024

Brookstone Haven of Randleman injury rate improved

Brookstone Haven of Randleman's TCR fell 3.8 from 9.9 in 2019 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.9 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Randleman, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 249% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #273/356
  • PHOTO Southwest Profession…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwest Professional Properties dba Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Brookstone Haven of Randleman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookstone Haven of Randleman averages 9.4 TCR (249% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookstone Haven of Randleman TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookstone Haven of Randleman falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #273 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Brookstone Haven of Randleman (36 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookstone Haven of Randleman
Brookstone Haven of Randleman (36 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookstone Haven of Randleman has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2023 11.3 3.8 3 0 0
2022 10.3 6.9 3 0 0
2019 9.9 9.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Randleman

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Randleman, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwest Professional Properties dba Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonata East at Viera 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FSL Magnolia Place, LLC 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walnut Crossing Assisted Living 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Butterball Hatchery # 1 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Farms (CV) 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yadkin 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edgecombe Genco, LLC. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dart Container Randleman 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2704 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2704 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asheboro Bearing Plant 203 FTE
NAT-TCR RRSC East Bay CA 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ironside Logistics LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Naperville Surgical Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Technologies, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Noah Project, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE KION Group Tradeport 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington Plant 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland Chutes 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.