Oil field road construction · Arizona

Brown and White, Inc.

Tucson, AZ · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brown and White, Inc. runs at 349% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Oil field road construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Brown and White, Inc.: 9.8 TCR = 349% of Oil field road construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brown and White, Inc. safety composite

Brown and White, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Brown and White, Inc. injury rate improved

Brown and White, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 7.2 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=14.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=23.7 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 349% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #62/63
  • PHOTO Dormark Construction…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dormark Construction Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Brown and White, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brown and White, Inc. averages 9.8 TCR (349% of the Oil field road construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brown and White, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=14 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=23.7 · 2023=16.7 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Brown and White, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Oil field road construction establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 63 Oil field road construction employers in Arizona.

Brown and White, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Brown and White, Inc.
Brown and White, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Brown and White, Inc. has fewer employees than the Oil field road construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2023 16.7 16.7 4 0 0
2022 23.7 7.9 6 0 0
2021 9.7 9.7 2 0 0
2020 11.1 11.1 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 14.0 14.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.2 7.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AZ · Tucson

4,078 Oil field road construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dormark Construction Co. 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIKING CONSTRUCTION 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridge and Decking Constrution 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caliber Paving Company, Inc. 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE TONOPAH BARNS 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO SOUTH COOLING 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shop and Warehouse 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Harquahala Generating Company 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Thorsen's-Norquist, Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Enterprises Inc 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2216 Hin73 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Comedy Club Oxnard LLC 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bellows Plumbing, Heating & Air - Marin 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wbs - Plover 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wbs - Windsor 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infinium Solar Inc 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.