Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing · Ohio

BRP Manufacturing

Lima, OH · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BRP Manufacturing runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

BRP Manufacturing: 6.2 TCR = 187% of Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BRP Manufacturing safety composite

BRP Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.2

2016→2024

BRP Manufacturing injury rate improved

BRP Manufacturing's TCR fell 12.2 from 14.2 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.2 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Lima, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/44
  • PHOTO Ashabula Rubber Co
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ashabula Rubber Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

BRP Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BRP Manufacturing averages 6.2 TCR (187% of the Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BRP Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=14.2 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=10 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where BRP Manufacturing falls in its industry

266 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 44 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut employers in Ohio.

BRP Manufacturing (46 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate BRP Manufacturing
BRP Manufacturing (46 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

BRP Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.0 6.0 5 0 0
2022 6.1 4.0 3 0 0
2021 0.7 0.2 3 0 0
2020 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 8.9 4.5 4 0 0
2017 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2016 14.2 7.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · OH · Lima

266 Extruded, molded or lathe-cut rubber goods manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 243 employers in Lima, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ashabula Rubber Co 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Rubber & Plastics - Litchfield 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WCCO Belting Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roy Johnson Inc DBA Mid South Roller 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holthouse Farms of Ohio Inc 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ohio Greenhouse Company 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willowbend Nurseries, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Ritas Medical Center 2,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Rita's Medical Center 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Ritas Medical Center 2,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIMA ENGINE 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Rogers Iron & Metal Corp. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BMR2 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake Shuttle/ Western Regional 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes & Cone Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Geodrill LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Euronique 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE HAZSC Hazleton Service Center 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rob Maintenance 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.