Service station construction · California

B&T Service Station Contractors

Nipomo, CA · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

B&T Service Station Contractors runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Service station construction workplace, earning a grade A.

B&T Service Station Contractors: 1.4 TCR = 48% of Service station construction BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

B&T Service Station Contractors safety composite

B&T Service Station Contractors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

B&T Service Station Contractors held a steady TCR band

B&T Service Station Contractors's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Nipomo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #139/486
  • PHOTO Momeni Construction,…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Momeni Construction, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

B&T Service Station Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows B&T Service Station Contractors averages 1.4 TCR (48% of the Service station construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

B&T Service Station Contractors TCR series: 2017=0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where B&T Service Station Contractors falls in its industry

4,692 Service station construction establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 486 Service station construction employers in California.

B&T Service Station Contractors (41 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate B&T Service Station Contractors
B&T Service Station Contractors (41 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

B&T Service Station Contractors has fewer employees than the Service station construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Nipomo

4,692 Service station construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 31 employers in Nipomo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Momeni Construction, INC. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robert E. Porter Construction Co., Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexander Building Construction 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox & Brindle Construction Co., Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buenaventura Ranch, LLC 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sarc, Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR WE LOVE BERRIES LLC 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cal South Harvesting LLC 285 FTE
NAT-TCR Odenton 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cumberland County Hospital Foundation, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Harbor Store # 213 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S04332 - Model City 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE District Wide 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paul Bradigan & Sons, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metaltec Steel Abrasive Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holy Trinity Hospital 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.