Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · Wisconsin

BTL Pallet Corporation

Franklin, WI · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BTL Pallet Corporation runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

BTL Pallet Corporation: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BTL Pallet Corporation safety composite

BTL Pallet Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

BTL Pallet Corporation: 2.6 → 10.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

BTL Pallet Corporation's TCR rose 7.4 from 2.6 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Franklin, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/46
  • PHOTO Fabrication Specialt…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fabrication Specialties Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

BTL Pallet Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BTL Pallet Corporation averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BTL Pallet Corporation TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3 · 2024=10 · BLS 3.3

Where BTL Pallet Corporation falls in its industry

952 Skids and pallets, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 46 Skids and pallets, wood or woo employers in Wisconsin.

BTL Pallet Corporation (34 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate BTL Pallet Corporation
BTL Pallet Corporation (34 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

BTL Pallet Corporation has fewer employees than the Skids and pallets, wood or wood and meta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.7 2.9 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · WI · Franklin

952 Skids and pallets, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 81 employers in Franklin, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fabrication Specialties Corp 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransPak - DIV 182 LOGISTICS 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recycled Romeoville (USIE) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHEP Elloree Service Center (UT11) 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Drumlin Dairy, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrillan East Coating 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant-5D 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salute Mission Critical, LLC 799 FTE
CITY-NEAR Krones 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin Public Schools 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL90 569 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkesburg Warehouse 2 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Academy School Dist 20 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UP 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Fort Lewis College 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE OEC Graphics - Chicago 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gratiot County Road Commission 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dora Hotel Company 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Livermore Feedmill 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.