Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · North Carolina

Buck CT/CC

Salisbury, NC · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Buck CT/CC runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Buck CT/CC: 2.1 TCR = 179% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Buck CT/CC safety composite

Buck CT/CC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Buck CT/CC: 0.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2023

Buck CT/CC's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Salisbury, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 179% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #14/20
  • PHOTO St. Francis Power Pl…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Francis Power Plant / Siemens Energy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Buck CT/CC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Buck CT/CC averages 2.1 TCR (179% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Buck CT/CC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Buck CT/CC falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in North Carolina.

Buck CT/CC (35 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Buck CT/CC
Buck CT/CC (35 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Buck CT/CC has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Salisbury

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 180 employers in Salisbury, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Francis Power Plant / Siemens Energy 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Theodore Cogeneration Facility - APC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-McClain Power Plant 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Labadie Energy Ctr Gen and Bud 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Rowan Medical Center 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowan County Government 1,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLT1 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Kyocera International Inc. FC Vancouver, WA. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Massman Automation Design 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EDL Massman LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Price Rite Store 569 Rosedale 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Copylite Products Corporation 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams-White 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CR_Potelco 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terhorst Manufacturing 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.