Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses · Texas

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston

Houston, TX · ~361 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses workplace, earning a grade C.

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston: 3.7 TCR = 111% of Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston safety composite

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2022→2024

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston injury rate improved

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston's TCR fell 3.4 from 5.3 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.3 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 111% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #19/51
  • PHOTO Smithfield Packaged …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston averages 3.7 TCR (111% of the Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston TCR series: 2022=5.3 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston falls in its industry

613 Boxed meat produced from purch establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 51 Boxed meat produced from purch employers in Texas.

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston (361 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston
Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston (361 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Buckhead Meat and Seafood of Houston has more employees than the Boxed meat produced from purchased carca median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 7 0 0
2023 3.8 3.4 17 0 0
2022 5.3 4.6 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · TX · Houston

613 Boxed meat produced from purchased carcasses employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allen Brother 1893, LLC, Opa-Locka, FL 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Livingston Deli 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rochester Meat Company 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO - Houston Service & Repair Facility 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE 11DA060 MED-SURG DALLAS-GRAPEVINE 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #679 (Market Street) 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-AA-AUS-AUSTIN-AUS-TRML 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Packaging, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoffman Mechanical Solutions, Inc - Greensboro 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Asama Coldwater Mfg.inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Smyth Companies - Minneapolis 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Financial Services 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coffeyville Regional Medical Center, Inc. 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE NY_New York City_120 E. 23rd St._0AMA1580 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparks 361 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.