Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation · Missouri

Budrovich Specialty Group

St. Louis, MO · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Budrovich Specialty Group runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Budrovich Specialty Group: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Budrovich Specialty Group safety composite

Budrovich Specialty Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Budrovich Specialty Group: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

Budrovich Specialty Group's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #13/29
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Ashland
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Ashland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Budrovich Specialty Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Budrovich Specialty Group averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Budrovich Specialty Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Budrovich Specialty Group falls in its industry

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and p establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 29 Insulation, boiler, duct and p employers in Missouri.

Budrovich Specialty Group (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Budrovich Specialty Group
Budrovich Specialty Group (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Budrovich Specialty Group has fewer employees than the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MO · St. Louis

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Ashland 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&D Elevator 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pro Pac International Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aumund Corporation 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Leadership Team 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations South 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Dorsett District 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services - UEC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Chemorse, Ltd 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulfport Treasure Hunt 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MidAmerican Building Services - Madison Office 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Electrical Construction, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Park at Modesto 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Material Processing LLC - Plant 1 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stamping Manufacturer 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rose Court Assisted Living 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.