Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Missouri

Bull Moose Industries

Gerald, MO · ~74 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bull Moose Industries runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade F.

Bull Moose Industries: 7.6 TCR = 229% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bull Moose Industries safety composite

Bull Moose Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bull Moose Industries: 3.8 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Bull Moose Industries's TCR rose 7.6 from 3.8 in 2016 to 11.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Gerald, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 229% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #4/7
  • PHOTO ASTI - Troutman Loca…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ASTI - Troutman Location (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Bull Moose Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bull Moose Industries averages 7.6 TCR (229% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bull Moose Industries TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=11.9 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=12.9 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=11.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Bull Moose Industries falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 7 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Missouri.

Bull Moose Industries (74 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bull Moose Industries
Bull Moose Industries (74 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Bull Moose Industries has fewer employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.4 5.7 8 0 0
2023 5.3 4.0 4 0 0
2022 8.5 5.7 6 0 0
2021 5.5 4.1 4 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 12.9 1.4 9 0 0
2018 5.6 1.4 3 1 0
2017 11.9 4.0 8 1 0
2016 3.8 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MO · Gerald

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 6 employers in Gerald, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ASTI - Troutman Location 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Markin Tubing 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Steel & Tube, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid-West Mfg. LLC, Chicago Heights Plant 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Underground 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Payne Family Homes 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC Industrial 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raineri Construction, LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woody Bogler Trucking Company 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerald Industries 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerald 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newly Weds Foods 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Arkansas Regional Organ Recovery Agency 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tilton 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR XOW 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheriff's Office-Jail 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Del-Co Water Company - 6682 Olentangy River Rd 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Textile Services, Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. - Midland, TX 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mack Manufacturing, Inc. 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.