Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Indiana

Bull Moose Tube

Elkhart, IN · ~125 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bull Moose Tube runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Bull Moose Tube: 6.6 TCR = 200% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bull Moose Tube safety composite

Bull Moose Tube scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2024

Bull Moose Tube injury rate improved

Bull Moose Tube's TCR fell 2.7 from 6.2 in 2019 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.2 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Elkhart, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 200% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO Powerbrace Corporation
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powerbrace Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Bull Moose Tube in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bull Moose Tube averages 6.6 TCR (200% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bull Moose Tube TCR series: 2019=6.2 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Bull Moose Tube falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Indiana.

Bull Moose Tube (125 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bull Moose Tube
Bull Moose Tube (125 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Bull Moose Tube has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2023 3.1 1.5 4 0 0
2022 12.9 6.0 15 0 0
2021 7.3 3.6 10 0 0
2019 6.2 3.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · IN · Elkhart

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powerbrace Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salem Tube, Inc 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal-Matic, LLC Minneapolis Plant 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheatland Tube Company 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Premier Energy Services 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE COMMERCIAL SERVICE OF BLOOMINGTON INC 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Container 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dallas Group of America 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Badass Farming 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Valley Manufacturing - Plant 2 Hilltop & B-82 &87 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wauconda 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Design Systems Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Binder Park Zoological Society, Inc 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intra Corporation 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE B-TEK Scales, LLC. 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denali Center 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.