Real estate property managers' offices, residential · California

Burbank Housing Management Corporation

Santa Rosa, CA · ~111 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Burbank Housing Management Corporation runs at 336% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Burbank Housing Management Corporation: 4.7 TCR = 336% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Burbank Housing Management Corporation safety composite

Burbank Housing Management Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2022→2024

Burbank Housing Management Corporation injury rate improved

Burbank Housing Management Corporation's TCR fell 4.6 from 7.0 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 336% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #24/47
  • PHOTO Independence Village…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Independence Village of Fishers East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Burbank Housing Management Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Burbank Housing Management Corporation averages 4.7 TCR (336% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Burbank Housing Management Corporation TCR series: 2022=7 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 1.4

Where Burbank Housing Management Corporation falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 47 Real estate property managers' employers in California.

Burbank Housing Management Corporation (111 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Burbank Housing Management Corporation
Burbank Housing Management Corporation (111 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Burbank Housing Management Corporation has more employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2022 7.0 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · CA · Santa Rosa

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Independence Village of Fishers East 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independence Village of Greenwood 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Griffis Blessing Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Sherry-Netherland 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CNTRL 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Ranch 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLEEN HARVEST 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redding Cement 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Gervais Elementary School 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Conroe Health Care Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McLaren Northern Michigan 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooper Standard - Gaylord 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arden, NC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE EciConstruction 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gen3 Az LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLC Diversified Inc 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.